What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

A 35-year-old woman suffered a stroke on an international flight. A Houston doctor believes he knows why. - KHOU

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

+ for

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

I am so tired of ignorant people like you calling us far rights, why democrats is so educated, they take things from their own mouth, you guys are totalitarian party?

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

a b i 1 x []

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

Woman on trial for poison mushroom killings says she was trying to fix "bland" meal - CBS News

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

in structures, such as:

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

When the sun dies, could life survive on the Jupiter ocean moon Europa? - Space

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.